Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 319 P.3d 757 - State v. Wolf

State v. Wolf’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Dusky v. United States · Pate v. Robinson · Drope v. Missouri · State v. Lafferty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “inability to have a rational and factual understanding of the proceedings against him or of the punishment specified for the offense charged,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “inability to consult with his counsel and to participate in the proceedings against him with a reasonable degree of rational understanding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[c]hallenges centered on factual findings regarding competency ... are subject to a clearly erroneous standard of review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.