319 So. 2d 22 - Bailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
115 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 116 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 803 So. 2d 598 - Connor v. State (2001), 379 So. 2d 643 - Norman v. State (1980)
115 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · 265 So. 2d 695 - Earman v. State · Lelis v. State · 300 So. 2d 732 - State v. Othen · Sagonias v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 116 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because of the dangers inherent to our modern vehicular mode of life, there may be justification for the stopping of a vehicle by a patrolman to determine the reason for its unusual operation. In this instance, although no vehicular regulation was being violated, it seemed strange to the officer that the vehicle was proceeding at only 45 miles per hour and was weaving, although not so much as to move out of its lane on one side or the other.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Ordinarily consent given after an illegal arrest will not lose its unconstitutional taint.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“... [I]t is encumbent upon the state to establish clearly a waiver of search and seizure rights and: `A distinction is recognized ... between submission to apparent authority of an officer and unqualified consent. Mere acquiescence in a search is not necessarily a waiver of a valid search warrant. Rather, for an occupant to waive his rights, it must clearly appear that he voluntarily permitted or expressly invited and agreed to the search, being cognizant of his rights in the premises ...'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.