Williams v. Michael’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2018
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mayflower Mills v. Breeland · Khoury v. Saik · McDaniel Bros. Construction Co. v. Jordy · 308 So. 2d 222 - Haralson v. State · Flowers v. Trotlos
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The appellant has obviously interpreted Haralson to mean that the posting of an appeal bond within the time prescribed by law is ... no longer jurisdictional but is now procedural and may be waived by the parties. This is not so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. Evans
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.