Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 319 SO2D 355 - State v. Carpenter

State v. Carpenter’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1982
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Harriss · 310 So. 2d 89 - State v. Lindsey · Prosser v. Parsons · State v. Wiener · State v. Dardar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “had a clearly definable meaning and thus the statute in which it was contained was not unconstitutionally vague. Due to the word's accepted meaning, the accused would be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him and would be afforded fair notice of the conduct proscribed by the statute. The same cannot be said about the word”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “of an offense under the state constitution will also ordinarily fail to provide the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.