Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 319 SO2D 609 - State v. Baker

State v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 1976
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chambers v. Mississippi · Upper Pecos Ass'n v. Peterson · Reardon v. Meacham · Russo v. Clark · McCroskey v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trial court's order granting a new trial is entitled to a strong presumption of correctness. .. . That rule is especially applicable in a criminal case such as this, in which the trial court obviously had reservations about the strength of the State's identification testimony. 319 So.2d at 610 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If the proferred [sic] evidence cannot be admitted, it cannot affect the result of the trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.