Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

319 So. 2d 621

Amell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 9, 1975

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1975-09-09

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1986

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1975-09-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant was found guilty by a jury of two counts of robbery and sentenced by the trial court to two consecutive life terms which were later modified to two concurrent life terms.

¶2Appellant has appealed the judgment and sentences. The several grounds relied on by the appellant for reversal have been considered by us in the light of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel and we find no reversible error has been shown. The record discloses that the case was fully and fairly tried, that the verdict is supported by the evidence and that the several rulings of the trial court challenged by the appellant did not on the record and under the law constitute harmful error.

¶3Therefore the judgment and sentences appealed are affirmed.

¶4Affirmed.

/319/so2d/621 · .json · Public domain