Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 319 SO2D 812 - Plescia v. Dunham

Plescia v. Dunham’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 1978
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Canter v. Koehring Company · State ex rel. Small v. Henderson · Spreen v. Gibbs · Dognibene v. Dunham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . the reviewing court must give great weight to factual conclusions of the trier of fact; where there is conflict in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed upon review, even though the appellate court may feel that its own evaluations and inferences are as reasonable . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.