Gamble v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kentucky v. Whorton · Commonwealth v. Benham · Kennedy v. Commonwealth · Wilburn v. Commonwealth · Whorton v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Turning to the instant case, drawing all fair and reasonable inferences in favor of the Commonwealth, Gamble entered Chase Bank, and handed Lindgren a note that said, "This is a robbery. I have a gun. Quietly empty your drawer fast." Gamble also verbally stated, "I have a gun" and told Lindgren after the robbery, "You just saved your life." Gamble specifically referenced a gun, threatened to use it, and implied that he would have used it had Lindgren not cooperated. Therefore, Gamble's statements amounted to threatening the immediate use of a gun.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lang v. Commonwealth“A person is guilty of robbery in the first degree when, in the course of committing theft, he uses or threatens the immediate use of physical force upon another person with intent to accomplish the theft and when he: (a) Causes physical injury to any person who is not a participant in the crime; or (b) Is armed with a deadly weapon; or (c) Uses or threatens the immediate use of a dangerous instrument upon any person who is not a participant in the crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lang v. Commonwealth“20 The Gamble Court then went on to distinguish Williams : Williams, however, is distinguishable from this case. First, it is not clear under which subsection of the first-degree robbery statute Williams was indicted. 21 More importantly, unlike Gamble, the defendant in Williams never specifically stated that he had a weapon or dangerous instrument of any sort. He simply pointed to a bulge in his pocket and asked,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lang v. Commonwealth
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.