Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 319 SW3D 687 - Lovill v. State

Lovill v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

27 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District)

Relationships

Relies on Yick Wo v. Hopkins · United States v. Armstrong · Cannon v. United States · Janet Reno, Attorney General v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee et al. · Marin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A complaint will not be preserved if the legal basis of the complaint raised on appeal varies from the complaint made at trial.”). . This issue is fairly subsumed within Appellant's points'on appeal. See Tex.R.App. P, 38.1(f) (stating that every point”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.