Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 319 U.S. 484 - Bartchy v. United States

Bartchy v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

319 U.S. 484 · 1943

Citation profile

142
cited by 142 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
October 1980
most recently cited

119 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 142 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1980 · most notably United States v. Ebey (1970), Venus v. United States (1960)

119 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

109019431950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedBartchy v. United States (from Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Virginian Hotel Corp. v. Helvering · Bartchy v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 142 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The regulation, it seems to us, is satisfied when the registrant, in good faith, provides a chain of forwarding addresses by which mail, sent to the address which is furnished the board, may be by the registrant reasonably expected to come into his hands in time for compliance.” 319 U.S. at 489 , 63 S.Ct. at 1208 . “[It does not] . . - require a registrant who is expecting a notice of induction to remain at one place or to notify the local board of every move or every address, even if the address be temporary.” 319 U.S. at 488 , 63 S.Ct. at 1208 .”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It shall be the duty of every registrant to keep his local board advised at all times of the address where mail will reach him.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Beginning on or about May 9, 1968, and continuing thereafter to on or about June 8, 1970, the defendant knowingly-failed to keep his local board advised at all times of the address where mail would reach him.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.