Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 A2D 392 - Meyer v. Capital Transit Co.

Meyer v. Capital Transit Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
July 1990
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 1990

19 state decisions

120194319501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Berger v. United States · Viereck v. United States · Dunlop v. United States · New York Cent Co v. Johnson · Washington Times Co. v. Bonner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f every remark made by counsel outside of the testimony were ground for a reversal, comparatively few verdicts would stand, since in the ardor of advocacy, and in the excitement of trial, even the most experienced counsel are occasionally carried away by this temptation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the court, by failing to apply appropriate disciplinary measures or to give suitable instructions, left the jurors with wrong or erroneous impressions, which were likely to mislead, improperly influence, or prejudice them to the disadvantage of the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.