Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

32 A.3d 439

In Re Dorny

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 2011

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 2011-12-08

Relies on In Re Fuller · In re Willingham

Decided 2011-12-08

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM

¶2 On consideration of the certified order of the Supreme Judicial Court of Suffolk County, Massachusetts disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, this court’s September 19, 2011, order suspending respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline,

¶3 ORDERED that Brett N. Dorny is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007), and In re Willingham, 900 A.2d 165 (D.C.2006) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate, including those involving disbarment). It is

¶4 FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.C.Bar R. XI, § 14(g).

/32/a3d/439 · .json · Public domain