Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

32 A.D.2d 643

Baron v. Fleischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1969-05-12

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1969-05-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 1992

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

401969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal by plaintiffs Fleischer in Action No. 2 (Nassau County) from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 8, 1968, which granted a motion by plaintiff Baron in Action No. 1 (Westchester County) to consolidate the actions for trial in Westchester County. Plaintiffs Fleischer had cross-moved to consolidate the actions for trial in Nassau County. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by deleting therefrom the second and third decretal paragraphs and by substituting therefor similar paragraphs providing (1) for trial of the consolidated action in Nassau County, (2) for a transfer to the County Clerk of Nassau County of Westchester County Clerk’s file No. 13041-1968 for consolidation with Nassau County Clerk’s file No. 4711-1968 and (3) that plaintiffs Fleischer shall be accorded the privilege of opening and closing to the jury. As so modified, oi;der affirmed, with $10 costs to plaintiffs Fleischer against plaintiff Baron. In our opinion, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to fix the venue of the consolidated action in Westchester County. We also feel that plaintiffs Fleischer should be given the right to open and close to the jury. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Munder and Martuseello, JJ., concur.

/32/ad2d/643 · .json · Public domain