People v. Cherry

¶1Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated December 4, 1967, affirmed. Defendant’s contention that his guilty plea was induced by the existence or threatened use of the fruits of an alleged illegal search and seizure is not properly before us. “Evidence dehors the record is not admissible in an appellate court for the purpose of reversing a judgment ” (People v. Vignera, 29 A D 2d 657). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.