In Re Werth’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently September 2004 · most notably In Re Jensen-Farley Pictures, Inc. (1985), In Re NRG Resources, Inc. (1986)
1 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 328 · 11 U.S.C. § 330
Relies on Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. · Bank of Marin v. England · Fanelli v. Hensley · Cle-Ware Industries, Inc. v. Sokolsky · In re Eureka Upholstering Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he court may award reasonable compensation for actual, necessary services rendered ... based on the time, the nature, the extent and the value of such services and the cost of comparable services other than in a case under this title.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.