32 Cal. 3d 80 - People v. Stankewitz’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 91 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 103 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably 10 Cal. 4th 764 - People v. Stanley (1995), 8 Cal. 4th 1060 - People v. Rodrigues (1994)
4 federal appellate · 91 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 2 Cal. 3d 118 - People v. Marsden · 2 Cal. 3d 205 - People v. Robles · 66 Cal. 2d 508 - People v. Pennington · 2 Cal. 3d 894 - People v. Williams · 67 Cal. 2d 272 - People v. Laudermilk
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`If a psychiatrist ... who has had sufficient opportunity to examine the accused, states under oath with particularity that in his professional opinion the accused is, because of mental illness, incapable of understanding the purpose or nature of the criminal proceedings being taken against him or is incapable of assisting in his defense or cooperating with counsel, the substantial-evidence test is satisfied.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.