32 Cal. 4th 269 - People v. Danks’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 78 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 89 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2022 · most notably 33 Cal. 4th 1250 - People v. Ault (2004), 37 Cal. 4th 240 - People v. Schmeck (2005)
9 federal appellate · 78 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · United States v. Olano · Faretta v. California · Ring v. Arizona · Smith v. Phillips
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[T]he jury's verdict must be based upon the evidence adduced at trial uninfluenced by extrajudicial evidence or communications or by improper association with the witnesses, parties, counsel or other persons.' [Citation.] `Equally implicit in this constitutional guaranty is the right to have the jury's deliberations conducted privately and in secret, free from all outside intrusions, and extraneous influences or intimidations.' [Citation.] Thus, `private, confidential deliberations outside of the presence of all nonjurors are an essential feature of the right to an impartial jury . . . .'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“' "[t]his limitation prevents one juror from upsetting a verdict of the whole jury by impugning his own or his fellow jurors' mental processes or reasons for assent or dissent”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Munoz“'Whether prejudice arose from juror misconduct ... is a mixed question of law and fact subject to an appellate court's independent determination.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.