Gilberd v. AC TRANSIT’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
51 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably Le Francois v. Goel (2005), 58 Cal. App. 4th 674 - Garcia v. Hejmadi (1997)
51 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 132 Cal. App. 3d 1005 - Blue Mountain Development Co. v. Carville · Carney v. Simmonds · Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. County of Santa Clara · Church v. County of Humboldt · Curtin v. Koskey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'new or different facts, circumstances, or law.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“To hold, under the circumstances presented in this case, that the general relief mechanism provided in section 473 could be used to circumvent the jurisdictional requirements for reconsideration found in section 1008 would undermine the intent of the Legislature as specifically expressed in section 1008, subdivision (e): `No application to reconsider any order . . . may be considered by any judge or court unless made according to this section.' Therefore, we decline to so hold.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“law when it reiterated its prior reasoning and authorities for rejecting the appellant's Government Code section 946.6 petition. The defendant also claimed that it had not intended to waive oral argument on the initial motions and this constituted a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.