Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 CONNAPP 296 - Davis v. Warden

Davis v. Warden’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
states following
June 2005
most recently cited

58 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Furman v. Georgia · Pope v. Nebraska · Bunkley v. Commissioner of Correction · State v. Kane

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`To satisfy the first prong, that his counsel's performance was deficient, the petitioner must establish that his counsel made errors so serious that [he] was not functioning as the”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The test simply stated is that the petitioner must demonstrate that there exists a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the . . . [sentence] would have been different.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.