Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 CONNAPP 849 - State v. Ellis

State v. Ellis’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2011

10 state decisions

40199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. · 26 Conn. App. 293 - Cummings & Lockwood v. Gray · Berchtold v. Maggi · State v. Burke · Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. Tucker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]o defendant . . . who has been arrested pursuant to a warrant may make a motion under subdivision (5) or (9) of Section 41-8.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The following defenses or objections, if capable of determination without a trial of the general issue, shall, if raised prior trial, be raised by a motion to dismiss the information . . . (5) Insufficiency of evidence or cause to justify the bringing or CT Page 12768 continuing of such information or placing of the defendant on trial. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Practice Book § 41-8 (9). The rules of practice further provide, however, that a defendant who has been arrested pursuant to a warrant is prohibited from making a motion to dismiss based on subsections (5) and (9). See Practice Book § 41-9 (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.