Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 F.1d 130 - Witters v. Sowles

Witters v. Sowles’s Empirical Analysis

32 F. 130 · 1887

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
4
states following
June 1956
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 1956

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

9018871890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Richmond v. Irons · Kennedy v. Gibson · National Bank v. Case · Connecticut Mut Life Ins Co v. Union Trust Co of New York · United States v. Knox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The executor appears to have delivered to the bank, while its failure was impending, stocks" and securities belonging to the estate, to an amount much larger than the amount of these shares, which were disposed of by the bank in payment and security of claims against it. He sets up in his answer that this was doné upon an understanding that the property should be restored by the bank, if it survived, and applied on an assessment, if it failed, and one should be made. And he now claims that so much of this property or its proceeds as is necessary should be applied upon this assessment, and bar further recovery. He claims, upon the evidence, that this understanding was had, with the bank examiner as well as with the officers of the bank. This assessment is for the purpose of paying those who were creditors of the bank at the time of its failure. That property went to pay others not creditors at the time of the failure, so far as it did pay them. The delivery of the property may have created a liability of the bank. If so, the assessment upon this and the rest of the stock would go ratably upon that and the other liabilities, if proved and established.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The assessment never was due to the hank, and does not belong to it. The assessment belongs to the creditors of the bank, and is recoverable by the receiver, only for the purpose of ratable distribution among them.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.