Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 F.2d 1 - United States v. Updike

United States v. Updike’s Empirical Analysis

32 F.2d 1 · 1929

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
March 1979
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1979 · most notably Phillips v. Commissioner (1931), United States v. Updike (1930)

12 federal appellate · 6 district ·

120192919301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1061 · 26 U.S.C. § 1057 · 26 U.S.C. § 1061 (§ 13309 of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017)

Relies on Dollar Savings Bank v. United States · Russell v. United States · United States v. Magnolia Petroleum Co. · Updike v. United States · United States v. Armstrong

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “statutory period of limitation properly applicable thereto”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.