May v. Heiner

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 1929.

Rehearing Denied June 24, 1929.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1929-01-09

2 counsel of record

Relies on Nichols v. Coolidge · May v. Heiner

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1929-01-09

¶1Sachs & Caplan and Charles H. Sachs, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants.

¶2John D. Meyer, U. S. Atty., Wm. J. Aiken, Asst. U. S. Atty., and John A. McCann, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., all of Pittsburgh, Pa. (C. M. Charest and Ottamar Hamele, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellee.

¶3Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Affirmed, on the opinion of the court below [25 F.(2d) 1004], with the observation that this case is distinguished from Nichols v. Coolidge, 274 U. S. 531, 47 S. Ct. 710; 71 L. Ed. 1184, 52 A. L. R. 1081, on the facts.