Canon v. Robertson’s Empirical Analysis
32 F.2d 295 · 1929
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 112 · 35 U.S.C. § 1 (American Inventors Protection Act of 1999) · 35 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Ex Parte Shaw · Butterworth v. Hill · Baldwin Co. v. R. S. Howard Co. · Paine Lumber Co. v. Neal · United States Ex Rel Edward Chott v. Thomas Ewing
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No civil suit shall be brought in any district court against any person by any original process or proceeding in any other district than that whereof he is an inhabitant.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Koser v. Blankenhorn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.