Brownson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
32 F.2d 844 · 1929
Citation profile
32 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1992 · most notably Reisman v. Caplin (1964), McCrone v. United States (1939)
32 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 1244
Relies on Edwin Hale v. William Henkel · Wilson v. United States · Blair v. United States · Perlman v. United States · Essgee Co. of China v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This testimonial duty to attend and disclose applies equally to the production of documents; and the process for documents will be implied wherever testimonial compulsion in general is predicated by a statute. Wigmore on Evidence, § 2193, and note.” ,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“to the matter required by law to be included in such return, with power to administer oaths to such person or persons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.