Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 F.3d 1 - United States v. Thompson

United States v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

32 F.3d 1 · 1994

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
August 2023
most recently cited

57 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably United States v. Wyatt (1996), United States v. Nale (1996)

57 federal appellate · 7 district ·

4601994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on Smith v. United States · Norman v. Reed · Wade v. Shook · United States v. Stewart · Hinojosa v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e review the court's factfinding for clear error, giving due deference to the court's application of the guidelines to the facts.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the phrase 'in connection with' should be interpreted broadly and ... where a defendant's possession of a firearm aids or facilitates the commission of another offense, the requisite link is present.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]f the defendant used or possessed any firearm or ammunition in connection with another felony offense....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.