United States v. Dayea’s Empirical Analysis
32 F.3d 1377 · 1994
Citation profile
23 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably United States v. Serrata (2005), United States v. Regueiro (2001)
23 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1112 · 18 U.S.C. § 113 · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Smith v. United States · Kuntz v. City of Dayton · Clampitt v. Interinsurance Exchange · Smith v. United States · United States v. Sanchez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an instrument capable of inflicting death or serious bodily injury.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'[C]ourts have found that, in the proper circumstances, almost anything can count as a dangerous weapon, including walking sticks, leather straps, rakes, tennis shoes, rubber boots, dogs, rings, concrete curbs, clothes irons, and stink bombs.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a dangerous weapon (including a firearm) was otherwise used”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.