Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 F.3d 27 - Davidson v. Flynn

Davidson v. Flynn’s Empirical Analysis

32 F.3d 27 · 1994

Citation profile

102
cited by 102 later decisions
November 2018
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 102 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Wright v. Goord (2009), United States v. Walsh (1999)

17 federal appellate · 3 district ·

510199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Wolff v. McDonnell · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Wilson v. Seiter · Whitley v. Albers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he need for the application of force, the relationship between the need and the amount of force that was used, the extent of injury inflicted, and whether force was applied in a good-faith effort to maintain or restore discipline, or maliciously and sadistically for the very purpose of causing harm.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he key inquiry under Hudson and its precedents is whether the alleged conduct involved 'unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “sparse pleadings by a pro se litigant unfamiliar with the requirements of the legal system may be sufficient at least to permit the plaintiff to amend his complaint to state a cause of action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.