Barnes Barnes v. C Barnes’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably Great Lakes Higher Education Corp. v. Pardee (In Re Pardee) (1998), Andrews v. Loheit (1995)
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Szostek · In the Matter of John Joseph METZ, Debtor. DOWNEY SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. John Joseph METZ, Appellee · In Re Khalil and Shahin Chinichian, Debtors. Khalil and Shahin Chinichian v. Attilio Campolongo · In Re Pearson · Tucker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“each of the requirements of section 1325 must be present and the debtor has the burden of proving that each element has been met.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Ewing · Andrews v. Loheit“compl[y] with the provisions of this chapter and with the other applicable provisions of this title,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Ewing · Andrews v. Loheit“We conclude that, like the requirement of 11 U.S.C. § 1325 (3), the requirement of § 1325(a)(5)(B)(ii) is mandatory. The bankruptcy court cannot confirm a plan of reorganization that does not comply with this requirement. Here, the value of the property to be distributed during the term of the five-year plan on account of the allowed secured claim is $25,703.25. This is less than the allowed amount of the secured claim, $43,000 plus interest, and the Debtors have not surrendered the property securing the claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.