Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 F.3d 418 - United States v. Thomas

United States v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

32 F.3d 418 · 1994

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably United States v. Sarno (1995), United States v. Lewis (1995)

19 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

210199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1346 · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on McNally v. United States · United Families of America v. Kendrick · United Families of America v. Kendrick · International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union Local 37 v. Boyd · California Architectural Building Products, Inc. v. Franciscan Ceramics, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “permitted to develop fully and fairly all of the evidence that would tend to exonerate him.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.