United States v. McAlpine’s Empirical Analysis
32 F.3d 484 · 1994
Citation profile
75 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 110 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably United States v. Voss (1996), United States v. Pappert (1997)
75 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3664 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742
Relies on Scherl v. Fisher · Norman v. Reed · Department of Revenue of Montana v. Ranch · United States v. Beaulieu · Hinojosa v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“recognition and affirmative acceptance of personal responsibility for his criminal conduct.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'after reviewing all the evidence, we are left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.'”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Clearly, the government has the burden to prove the amount of loss [under § 2F1.1] by a preponderance of the evidence.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.