Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

32 F.3d 571

Docket No. 94-1610.

United States v. Long

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: July 25, 1994. Filed: August 1, 1994.

This page is marked noindex.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-07-25

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 2002 · most notably United States v. Evans (2002), Stoebner v. Parry, Murray, Ward & Moxley (1996)

27 federal appellate ·

Relies on United States v. Welsand

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-07-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Carl Edward Long appeals the sentence imposed by the district court under the sentencing guidelines. Long contends the district court improperly ordered restitution for the amounts attributable to the fraudulent scheme alleged in the indictment instead of limiting restitution to the amount involved in the count of conviction. Long's contention, however, is foreclosed by this court's contrary holding in United States v. Welsand, 23 F.3d 205, 207 (8th Cir. 1994). We thus affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

/32/f3d/571 · .json · Public domain