United States v. Barton’s Empirical Analysis
32 F.3d 61 · 1994
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2010
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986)
Relies on National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Fussell v. Price · United States v. Daughtrey · Wetherell v. De Grandy · United States v. Connell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The amendment of the guideline to add the words 'or believed' was, according to the statement of purpose, a 'revis[ion] ... to reflect the enactment' of a new law designed to net targets of government stings who could not know in fact that the money was from illegal trade.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]f the defendant knew or believed that the funds were the proceeds of an unlawful activity involving the manufacture, importation, or distribution of narcotics or other controlled substances.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.