Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. 104 Acres of Land, More or Less’s Empirical Analysis
32 F.3d 632 · 1994
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 23 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably Torres-Rivera v. O'Neill-Cancel (2008), Accusoft Corp. v. Palo (2001)
5 federal appellate · 23 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 4601 (Uniform Relocation Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 4654
Relies on Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jean · Grendel's Den, Inc. v. Larkin · Weinberger v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp. · United States v. Metropolitan District Commission · Foley v. City of Lowell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“without any indication of the subject matter involved.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]n order for litigants to receive fee awards ... they [must] submit 'a full and specific accounting of the tasks performed, the dates of performance, and the number of hours spent on each task.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Williams v. Poulos“the absence of detailed contemporaneous time records, except in extraordinary circumstances, will call for a substantial reduction in any award or, in egregious cases, disallowance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Williams v. Poulos
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.