Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 F.3d 682 - United States v. Silkowski

United States v. Silkowski’s Empirical Analysis

32 F.3d 682 · 1994

Citation profile

97
cited by 97 later decisions
3
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

54 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 97 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably United States v. Hill (1996), United States v. Broughton-Jones (1995)

54 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

3801994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3282 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3664 · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act)

Relies on National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Hughey v. United States · Keene Corp. v. United States · United States v. Concepcion · United States v. Santiago

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The trial] court is prohibited from ordering restitution for losses attributed to conduct that was not part of the offense of conviction because of the applicable statute of limitations in [the] case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “order restitution in any criminal case to the extent agreed to by the parties in a plea agreement.” 18 U.S.C. § 3663 (a)(3).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “directly caused by conduct within the temporal limits of the offense of conviction”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.