United States v. Holzer’s Empirical Analysis
2022
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 247 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (§ 204 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. Olano · United States v. Hahn · United States v. Green · United States v. Smith · United States v. Sandoval
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the right to appeal any matter in connection with this prosecution; conviction, or sentence,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Aldape v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.