Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

32 F. App'x 104

Jones v. Baskerville

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided April 12, 2002

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-04-12

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2004

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-04-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Ricardo D. Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. Baskerville, No. CA-01-134 (E.D.Va. Dec. 11, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.

/32/fappx/104 · .json · Public domain