32 F. Supp. 2d 92 - Lux v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2018
2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 1452 · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Soberon v. United States · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Ltd. Partnership · Bryant v. Maffucci
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In conducting this analysis, the court may consider such factors as the accepted and applicable rules or standards of the sport, published guidelines, evidence of common usage, conditions that exist at similar facilities, proof of prior accidents at the same place under substantially similar circumstances, or the absence of prior accidents, or other relevant factors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“courts have focused on the status of the plaintiff at the time of the alleged injury to determine whether he or she was a 'user' of the facility within the meaning of § 5-326.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ward v. Stewart“[A]wareness of risk is not to be determined in a vacuum. It is, rather, to be assessed against the background of the skill and experience of the particular plaintiff....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.