¶1By the Court
¶2delivering the opinion.
¶3The principal question in this case is, whether a promise made by the maker of a promissory note, is sufficient to take the case out of the Statute of Limitations, as against the indorser.
¶4This question was elaborately argued, and upon great deliberation decided by this Court, at the Savannah term, in June, 1860, the case being still unpublished.
¶5The Court held, in that case, that the qew promise of the maker was not sufficient to take the case out of the Statute as against the indorser. To that decision we adhere.
¶6The only other question in this case grew out of a new promise made by the indorser himself; but the record shows that that promise, as well as the orignal undertaking, was barred by the Statute.
¶7We, hold, therefore, that the Court below erred in admitting the note in evidence, and that there was error in the final judgment, which is reversed.
¶8Judgment reversed.