32 Ga. App. 18
Decided April 15, 1924
Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1924-04-15
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1924-04-15
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1952
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The defendant was convicted of manufacturing whisky. The evidence failed to establish that any whisky had been made at the distillery in question, or that the beer found there by the arresting officers was intoxicating. The verdict, therefore, was unauthorized, and the overruling of the motion for a new trial was error. If the conviction had been for an attempt to manufacture whisky, another question would have-been presented.
¶2 Judgment reversed.