Territory v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 1985
1 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Territory v. Palai · Uuku v. Kaio · Clement v. Cartwright · Weston v. Montgomery · Territory of Hawaii v. Kum Foo Sung
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * There are but few cases tried in which new evidence cannot be hunted after trial, and in order to secure to parties the termination of their legal controversies the Court must be wary about granting new trials upon insufficient excuses for not procuring the evidence when the parties had their day in Court.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the equivalent of a statement, on behalf of the defendant, that at that time he was perfectly satisfied to go to trial before the twelve proposed jurors who were then in the jury box.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gager“general, widespread newspaper prejudice concerning the public rape hysteria that existed and was prevalent in Honolulu, T.H., at the time of said trial which was short of lynch law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gager
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.