32 Ill. App. 396
Decided February 14, 1890
Appellate Court of Illinois · decided 1890-02-14
<p>Practice—Bill of Exceptions.</p> <p>This court will not interfere with the judgment of the trial court where the bill of exceptions fails to show a motion for a new trial made, or exception to the judgment entered.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1892
1 state decisions
Relies on James v. Dexter · Dickhut v. Durrell · Law v. Fletcher
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1890-02-14
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The judgment in this case must be affirmed because the bill of exceptions fails to show that a motion for a new trial, or exception to the judgment was - made. The record of the judgment as certified by the clerk does so show, but this is not the proper mode. James v. Dexter, 113 Ill. 654; Dickett v. Durrell, 11 Ill. 72; Law v. Fletcher, 84 Ill. 45.
¶2The judgment of the County Court will therefore be affirmed.
¶3Judgment affirmed.