Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 Ill. App. 3d 182 - People v. Brown

32 Ill. App. 3d 182 - People v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
September 1994
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 1994

24 state decisions

180197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 52 Ill. 2d 107 - People v. Canale · 45 Ill. 2d 33 - The PEOPLE v. McMath · 3 Ill. App. 3d 829 - People v. Wright · 52 Ill. 2d 7 - People v. Pierce · 29 Ill. 2d 375 - The PEOPLE v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is well settled that clear and convincing testimony of the victim standing alone is sufficient to support a conviction for rape even without corroboration. (People v. Nichols (1974), 17 Ill. App. 3d 871 .) Clear and convincing evidence, however, is not synonymous with uncontradicted or unimpeached testimony. Minor variances in the testimony may occur, and if so, these variances constitute mere discrepancies going only to credibility. (People v. Wright (1972), 3 Ill. App. 3d 829 .) It is the task of the trier of fact, here the court, to weigh these discrepancies. If it is found the discrepancies are so minor as not to detract from the reasonableness of the victim’s story as a whole, her testimony may be found to be clear and convincing. (People v. Brown (1963), 29 Ill. 2d 375 .)" *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.