Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 Ill. App. 3d 305 - People v. Beason

32 Ill. App. 3d 305 - People v. Beason’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
March 1997
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 1997

11 state decisions

50197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 56 Ill. 2d 493 - People v. Lilly · 52 Ill. 2d 374 - People v. Clark · 48 Ill. 2d 239 - The People v. Fox · 46 Ill. 2d 109 - The People v. Triplett · 21 Ill. App. 3d 734 - People v. Abrams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * The rule is well established that where different offenses arise out of the same actions of a defendant, only one conviction and sentence may be imposed. (People v. Lilly, 56 Ill. 2d 493 , 309 N.E.2d 1 .) A review of the facts adduced at trial demonstrates that defendant’s actions which constituted the offense of aggravated battery were the means by which defendant committed the crime of attempt rape. Under these circumstances, defendant’s conviction and sentence on both charges was improper. (People v. Cochran, 10 Ill. App. 3d 786 , 295 N.E.2d 246 .) Accordingly, defendant’s conviction for aggravated battery must be vacated.” ( 32 Ill. App. 3d 305, 308 , 336 N.E.2d 511 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.