Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 664

Bell v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Decided September 11, 1978

Court of Claims of Illinois · decided 1978-09-11

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 1989

6 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1978-09-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Polos, C.J.

¶1Claimant, an inmate of an Illinois penal institution, has brought this action to recover the value of certain items of personal property of which he was allegedly possessed while incarcerated. Claimant contends that the property in question was lost while in the actual physical possession of the State of Illinois, and that the State is liable as a bailee for the return of that property.

¶2However, upon examination of the record in this cause, we find that Claimant’s property was lost during the course of a shake down conducted by an employee of the Illinois Department of Corrections in search of contraband.

¶3This was not an instance where the State took actual physical possession of Claimant’s property, and this Court does not recognize a right to recovery under these circumstances. See, Bargas v. State, 32 Ill.Ct.Cl.__.

¶4It is therefore ordered that this cause be, and hereby is, denied.

/32/illctcl/664 · .json · Public domain