Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 KAN 177 - Jones v. Inness

Jones v. Inness’s Empirical Analysis

1884

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
5
states following
September 1995
most recently cited

1 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 1995

1 district · 13 state decisions

50188418901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where an attorney at law does compromise 'and settle his client’s claim, without any authority from his client, and in such settlement the attorney receives from the adverse party a consideration which is much less than the client's demand, the client may ignore such compromise and settlement, and treat the same as a nullity, and recover the full amount of his demand from the adverse party.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.