Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 KAN 376 - Scantlin v. Allison

Scantlin v. Allison’s Empirical Analysis

1884

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
4
states following
July 1966
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 1966

1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

70188418901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It must also be remembered that this is an action for partition; and in such actions courts may generally do equity and justice between the parties.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.