Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 KANAPP2D 1027 - State v. Freeman

State v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2011
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Maass · State v. Gordon · State v. Luna · 2003 Pa. Super. 361 - Commonwealth v. Byrne · 28 Kan. App. 2d 148 - State v. Luna

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`The signature of the defendant below indicates the defendant's agreement to this request for an extension and his acknowledgment that he has a right to seek counsel in this matter.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “wholly omits the crucial information that [the defendant] was entitled to a hearing and a judicial finding of necessity before his probation could be extended.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “extension of the duration of probation may only be accomplished under subsection [c][8] pursuant to a modification hearing and a finding of judicial necessity”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.