32 Kan. App. 2d 1222 - State v. Post’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2005
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · State v. Maass · Williamson v. City of Hays · State v. McGill · State v. Sisk
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(1) Commit the defendant to the custody of the secretary of corrections if the current crime of conviction is a felony and the sentence presumes imprisonment, or the sentence imposed is a dispositional departure to imprisonment; or, if confinement is for a misdemeanor, to jail for the term provided by law; .... “(3) release the defendant on probation if the current crime of conviction and criminal history fall within a presumptive nonprison category or through a departure for substantial and compelling reasons subject to such conditions as the court may deem appropriate . . . ; “(4) assign the defendant to a community correctional services program as provided in K.S.A. 75-5291, and amendments thereto, or through a departure for substantial and compelling reasons subject to such conditions as the court may deem appropriate, including orders requiring full or partial restitution; .... “(11) impose any appropriate combination of (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9) and (10).” (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Post
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.