Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 Kan. App. 2d 673 - State v. McCray

32 Kan. App. 2d 673 - State v. McCray’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Dewees v. United States · Frank v. Blackburn · Miles v. Dorsey · United States v. Skidmore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Here, McCray submitted a detailed ‘Agreed Statement’ for the purpose of supporting his plea .... It seems particularly counterproductive to require discussion with the defendant regarding the factual basis to support an Alford plea; the very nature of such a plea makes it unlikely that the defendant would agree with or accept the factual basis since it would presumably undermine his purported innocence.” (Emphasis added.) 32 Kan. App. 2d at 678 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““At the plea hearing, the district court . . . accepted McCrays petition to enter the Alford plea, as well as the written stipulated facts supporting the factual basis for the plea. McCray s counsel specifically agreed that the written stipulated facts summarized the evidence the State believed it could produce at trial.” (Emphasis added.) 32 Kan. App. 2d at 675 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.